|
|
Alex's Views on Indian Nuclear Test of May 18, 1998 [Archive]
Thoughts about Indian Nuclear Tests
(by Alex, A.P, 20 May, 1998)
Support the test or not? This was a difficult proposition in my
mind for the last one week. Now after a week of my mental deliberations, I AM
CONVINCED THAT the action of the Indian Government was right. The following
questions helped me to reach that decision.
-
Who would come forward to help India in case of a war with
either Pakistan or China? If China (which has an authoritarian regime) attacks
India, which it did once, who is going to help India? Nobody. If anybody thinks
that Indian life is not valuable enough, it is not India's problem.
-
Many western countries think that nuclear weapons must be an
integral part of their defense arsenals then WHY not INDIA?. India has very
strong genuine security concerns which can not be neglected. For last 10 years,
India has been fighting a Proxy war in Jammu and Kashmir. Also few days before
Pakistan has test fired a missile, which makes India more Vulnerable.
-
Where was REST of the world when CHINA did the nuclear tests
last year? Nobody protested to this extent and specially to the level of
slapping sanctions.
-
INDIA is bigger than the US, USSR, Britain and France put
together, (US, Britain, USSR and France together is less democratically
representable than INDIA, in terms of number of human beings living.) who all
have nuclear weapons, so why shouldn't India?
-
And what's with this self righteousness of west. If west was
really concerned with human rights it would not support a country like China
with Most Favored Nation status, a country that rolls tanks over its own people
and can imprison anyone without a trial.
-
If the world had taken notice of India earlier, maybe all this
would not have happened. Few months ago BILL CLINTON vetoed legislation passed
in congress AND in the senate, which would have banned the sale of
missile-guidance systems to CHINA. Since then, two U.S. companies have supplied
CHINA with these systems. Reportedly, for China's space program, this newly
introduced technology coupled with China's existing nuclear war-heads,
establishes a new and serious threat precedence in the region. To send a clear
warning-signal, INDIA JUST DETONATED 5 THERMAL-NUCLEAR DEVICES in their
North-West territory.
-
Who gave the moral right for only five countries to hold nuclear
weapons? It is none of their business to bully other countries in signing the
CTBT. And considering the situation in the Indian sub continent where China
holds the nuclear arms and to date has conducted many nuclear explosions and is
hell bent on supplying Pakistan the technology, it was a logical choice.
-
Before criticizing India, let us hear what the big powers has to
say about their nuclear weapons. Are they ready to destroy it? If they had any
plans like that, India will be ready to stop all weapon-oriented nuclear
developments in the first place.
-
Being the largest democracy, India deserves much more respect
than she currently gets. Somehow, it is established in world circles that power
is respect. This test helped India to achieve that to a certain extent.
-
Why US talking sanctions against India? I don't recall talks of
sanctions against France a few years ago! Sanctions!!! What for? When a country
which has 5% of the world population can have enough nuclear weapons to kill
every living being many times over and have the dubious honor of using them
twice in war, why all this hullabaloo for the 5 nuclear tests, yes only tests,
by a country which has roughly one-fifth of the world population? This is not
morality, this is hypocrisy....!!
The most important question that I would like all the so called
concerned nations to answer about the hue and cry that they are raising about
India's nuclear tests is "Where was their concern for nuclear proliferation when
they were busy arming themselves? People sitting in glass houses should not try
to throw stones at others.
We have so many unanswered questions that we have to analyze
before IGNORING India's stance. These questions will be fully significant if you
analyze the situation an a very macro level. Else...You might not agree with
me... But then it really doesn't matter as the so called sanctions. (Do you know
that the US aid constitutes only 2% of the total Indian economy? India will
prove that it do not need these pea-nuts to survive!! The west will eventually
have to lift the sanctions within few months for their own business
interest...)
India has traditionally followed a doctrine of defense, geared
to be defensive in nature. India has never tried to attack, or launch a
first-strike against any other nation. It is sad to note that the WORLD still
does not recognize the worries of that country which has been attacked by its
neighbors four times in a couple of decades and sees a hostile environment along
with double standards from our western political and military community.
India had first tested nuclear device in 1974 and since then it
has exercised commendable restraint regarding further tests. India has a
reputation of being responsible with such high technology. No body need
worry/feel threatened, about this. It might disappoint many Nuclear power
countries, surely any new member is obviously unwelcome.
Why should India be condemned while other countries like the US,
Russia and China have strengthened their defense by going nuclear ages ago? The
best way to reduce the tension in the region and to discourage others from
developing nuclear weapons is to have the afore-mentioned countries destroy
their nuclear arsenal. But the thing is: will they ever do it? Setting yourself
as a model for others to follow suit is far better than carping at them
hypocritically. The US seems to be more silent on this front than it used to be.
On one side U.S has been supporting Pakistan and it is a well known fact. It has
never voiced seriously against the actions of Pakistan in supporting the
terrorist groups operating in India.
India has all the capabilities to set an example for
implementing and maintaining peace in the region. No Indian citizen would like
to fight with neighbors or with the world. U.S should try to comprehend the
underlying reality and approach this issue with utmost concern and if necessary,
shall take it's own corrective action to maintain transparency in its relations
with Pakistan. It's a pity that one of the most potential regions of the world
is not understanding the strength of unity.
Nuclear disarmament cannot apply to only 3rd world countries,
but rather by sweeping changes. The western world CANNOT dictate the politics of
Asia. Their continual policy of "Do as I say, but not as I do" doesn't hold
water anymore. Having said that, i think it's important that people realize the
instability of the Asian region. With China to it's east and Pakistan to it's
west, India has no choice other than to protect itself, taking into account it's
history with both those nations. Furthermore, I find it highly insulting that
the US is willing to negotiate and support Israel, a known possessor nuclear
power, and yet so quick to condemn the Indian government especially since India
did not sign the NNPT and is not obligated to abide by its rules.
Countries who have strengthened their nuclear arsenal when India
was in and was recovering from merciless and parasitic British rule should not
question India's nuclear testing. They have no right to talk about India's
nuclear capabilities when they have themselves stocked piles of nuclear weapons.
We (Indians) waited long enough (for 24 years) and decently
before the next nuke test was conducted, in spite of US/West sanctions on our
programs. In a way that was good, since India indigenously developed the
supercomputer PARAM after being denied the CRAY .
Well this will definitely start an arms race in the
Sub-continent. But there was no way we could have been an idle spectator
(watching the Chinese/ Koreans & Pakistani missile transfer). The point I wish
to make is that I feel finally the Indian Govt. is putting itself in an
aggressive bargaining position. One of the items on their agenda, must be
getting the Security Council (permanent) seat.
People view non-violence as a sign of weakness. In today's
world, power is greatness. It is India's choice to become powerful.
Unfortunately when it comes to global affairs, words like democracy, freedom,
human rights etc. are used mainly as political weapons. India has traditionally
followed a doctrine of defense, geared to be defensive in nature. India has
never tried to attack, or launch a first-strike against any other nation.
For all those who oppose the test.... Let me say this:
Had Japan too had nuclear power, I don't think that those
incidents at Hiroshima or Nagasaki would have ever happened. At least the
attackers would have thought twice.
It serves the purpose of India to make other's like China to
think twice before they harm India. Let India's past answer this question. Over
the ages we have silently stood by while invading marauders played havoc. Take a
moment to look at just the past 50 years. We were attacked by China - A nuclear
State, and thrice by Pakistan. When were we the aggressors? In the past we have
fought back successfully. If not successfully, we have managed to assimilate the
enemy into us. It is no longer possible in this day and age. I ask you, have you
had such a tolerant country with such a subjugated recent past (900 years). I
ask you, have you faced threats like these from the times of Alexander I until
now on your home soil? Have you faced a thousand proxy wars everyday of your
life? Are you willing to risk your national security for anything? Our past
actions speak just for us. Put yourself in our shoes before you say anything.
I believe that a nation of 1 Billion people (1/5 th of the human
race) has the right to develop weapons. The west reserves the right to perfect
and miniaturize there nuclear weapons then why not INDIA? The Comprehensive Test
Ban Treaty is all "crap". It benefits only the P5. The P5 quietly get to improve
there weapons. Pakistan and China are under US umbrella either military or
economic. What about India? In case of a war between China and India, the US
will only protect its economic interests and support China. It is not
safeguarding India's interest and why should it? "This is the world order!" Each
country has to be in some block either economically or military wise; if you are
a loner like INDIA, then you got to safeguard your interests.
Being an Indian I am feeling excited from inside. It is really
an achievement for Indians. Its not exactly like winning the first prize in your
school competition and feeling proud about it.. Its more like having to run
deliberately and try to win the prize.
We Indians are not rejoicing the technological accomplishment.
It is true that the technology is old, just like it is true that India had also
tested it way back in 1974. It was only our maturity and self restraint as a
country that we decided to forgo the nuclear option. However the world does not
take kindly to any perceived sign of weakness. I was also proud, because it
proved to me what I had always believed, that India can achieve anything if it
decides to put its resources behind the attempt. Yes!!! I am a Proud
Indian today!
Reactions...!
|
|